Yes, I know a lot of people have said the same thing but if I remove it I
lose data more often than not when R:Base crashes. As I said to Mike,
usually, I can recover R:Base enough with CrashGuard to save my work.

The real crux is that R:Base really should not crash - full stop.

According the C/G stats: R:Base has crashed 947 time since I last reset the
system on 06/06/2002.
The next biggest offender is Wordpad with 44 - but I know why that happens
and I can control it.
After that, Irfan viewer with 15 - and that usually crashes because/after
R:Base crashes and I can't recover it.
Everything else is less than 10.

Regards,
Alastair.



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Billing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 2:05 PM
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Setting Scratch, scratch files and R:Base crashes


> Hi Alaster,
>
> My experience with "CrashGuard" was similar to Mike's, but I started with
> Win98.  I believe even Symantec got the message and doesn't market it any
> more.  It didn't come with my new System Works 2003.  I'd get rid of it if
I
> were you.
>
> Dave Billing
> Tall Tree Business Solutions
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "MikeB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 1:56 PM
> Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Setting Scratch, scratch files and R:Base crashes
>
>
> >
> > I thought "CrashGuard" cause more trouble than any piece of utility
> software I ever installed.  That
> > was early Win95 when I installed it and removed it very shortly
> thereafter...
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Alastair Burr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "RBASE-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 7:16 AM
> > Subject: [RBASE-L] - Setting Scratch, scratch files and R:Base crashes
> >
> >
> > > I'd like to sound out the list's views on what goes on with scratch
> files:
> > >
> > > As you all know, I've had endless problems with R:Base crashing since
> > > changing from Dos to Windows 2 years ago.
> > >
> > > You also all know that a couple of things have recently made
significant
> > > differences to the crashes, namely:
> > > 1) Changing a file extension from .DAT to .$$$.
> > > 2) Removing the SET SCRATCH C:\TEMP setting.
> > >
> > > Currently, I still get a few crashes but nowhere near as many.
However,
> I
> > > noticed today that CrashGuard - yes, I'm still using it - notified a
> problem
> > > with a .$$$ scratch file in a directory where I didn't think there
> should be
> > > a scratch file.
> > >
> > > I have 5 databases in 5 sub-directories of D:\DBFiles.
> > > My start-up procedure goes to one of the sub-directories and opens its
> > > database and a form.
> > > (This is my controlling database that contains details of the other 4
> DBs
> > > and backups, maintenance, etc., etc..)
> > > The form, basically, has buttons that allow access to the other 4
> databases.
> > > The app that is running uses QUIT TO to change to apps that run the
> other 4
> > > DBs.
> > >
> > > Generally, this all works perfectly well - except for the crashes...
> > >
> > > Before I removed the scratch setting of C:\TEMP I assumed that all the
> > > scratch files would always be in C:\TEMP.
> > >
> > > Having removed it I assumed that the scratch files would be in the
> > > respective directories for each database as and when a database is
> opened.
> > >
> > > CrashGuard had a problem with the .$$$ in D:\DBFiles - not one of the
> > > sub-directories. My short-cut has its start-in directory as D:\DBFiles
> but a
> > > database is not opened until the app changes directory to one of the
> > > sub-directories. It was set that way originally because I often opened
> > > R:Base to work on apps rather than to _run_ the apps.
> > >
> > > If anybody has had any similar experiences or problems with
> sub-directories
> > > I'd be very interested to hear how they were overcome.
> > >
> > > Thanks & regards,
> > > Alastair.
> > >
> > > ----------------------------------
> > > A D B Burr,
> > > St. Albans, UK.
> > > ----------------------------------
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > ----------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>

Reply via email to