|
I've also been doing that, but I don't adjust much because I think they
are usually scanned electronically; that's why the red ink. I think printing them on a blank sheet would work just as well if they are scanned.. Certainly they will be a thing of the past soon anyway. Any of you guys try to submit electronically from Rbase? I think direct transmission to the payer is the safest way, would be HIPPA compliant, AND would relegate the 1500 into history. bill Ned Ritchie wrote: I've used HCFA 1500 forms for years in DOS and have found that over those years the trimming on the HCFA 1500 form varies from shipment to shipment and even within the same shipment.So I've had to tune the report to the changing HCFA 1500 forms! For Version 7. . . Someone needs to build a form in color so that we can print the whole mess on blank paper. Ned -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of mjs Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 7:59 AM To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - RE: Printing on 1500 Pre-printed Forms I solved the problem buy using a brother HL-1650 in DOS mode. It has vertical and horizontal offsets that can be entered as part of the printer setup. After printing the first HCFA 1500, you can measure the "placement error" and enter the exact number of pixels you need to "move the ink" to print on those lousy pink forms! Mike -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of J.M. GRATIAS Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 10:20 AM To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - Printing on 1500 Pre-printed Forms Marc : |
- [RBASE-L] - RE: Printing on 1500 Pre-printed Forms marc schluter
- [RBASE-L] - Re: Printing on 1500 Pre-printed Forms marc schluter
- [RBASE-L] - RE: Printing on 1500 Pre-printed Forms marc schluter
- [RBASE-L] - RE: Printing on 1500 Pre-printed Forms Ned Ritchie
- [RBASE-L] - RE: Printing on 1500 Pre-printed Forms marc schluter
- William Stacy

