|
The good thing about DOS was that you didn't - ie
couldn't - try to do too much at once. That meant that if something didn't work
it was almost impossible for the blame to be laid at the performance of "other"
software.
Regards,
Alastair.
Gunnar, I must agree on DOS 6.22, but I've found Win2000 to be as stable, at least IMHO. I haven't moved to XP yet, but maybe on SP 2 or 3 <g> And Win2000 fails MUCH more gracefully than DOS did. I don't have to use the 3 fingered DOS salute (Cntl-Alt-Del) NEAR as often as I did with in the good old days. Seems the good old days aren't as good as they seemed, we just seem to forget how DOS used to flog us <g> Damon Damon D. Kaufman President Stalder Spring Works, Inc ISO-9002 / QS-9000 Certified 2345 S. Yellow Springs St. Springfield, Ohio 45506 Voice 937-322-6120 Fax 937-322-2126 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
- [RBASE-L] - SV: Label Help -- solved! Gunnar Ekblad
- [RBASE-L] - SV: Label Help -- solved! KarenTellef
- [RBASE-L] - SV: Label Help -- solved! DKauf22024
- [RBASE-L] - SV: Label Help -- solved! Gunnar Ekblad
- [RBASE-L] - SV: Label Help -- solved! MikeB
- [RBASE-L] - SV: Label Help -- solved! Alastair Burr
- [RBASE-L] - SV: Label Help -- solved! Gunnar Ekblad

