>> but I do not think they can match the rapid development of RBase.<<

And this is the most important point.  Now that Razzak has given us so many 
tools to work with, it is so much faster and easier to have a working app or 
sample than with other systems.  I'm a big fan of the compiler, and this has 
revolutionized the way I distribute things - makes it so seamless and quick.  
No one can compete except out of blind loyalty to Microsoft, Oracle, etc. and 
misinformation.
BC



From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Marc
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2008 9:08 AM
To: RBASE-L Mailing List
Subject: [RBASE-L] - 3 cheers for RBase

Thanks Razzak

I thought I would give everyone a small update on the .Net SQL Exp
program that is trying to replace my app.

They are over 1 year behind schedule to release the program and still
do not have a beta test site working yet.

It seems the son in law of my distributor has a computer consulting
company and said his company could do this.

They pre-sold this pie in the sky program to many of my users so the
longer it takes them to get a working version delivered the more offices
will stick with me and RBase and blow them off.

I know they are going to try to match all the features I have, so I keep
adding new bells and whistles each month.  My plan is to make my
program the best it can be and to keep them busy trying to keep up
with RBase.

I know .Net and SQL server Exp is suppose to be a powerful combo
but I do not think they can match the rapid development of RBase.

Now you know why I have so many questions.

Marc


Reply via email to