Razzak, I wish it were just normalization.
It is more me not getting it. I have to apply a discount on a report that is in the Cust_Discount table with a id CustNub2. The Master Table has both CustNub2 and Pon. The Charges table has Pon as it ID. There is no reason for the CustNub2 to be in the Charges Table or the Pon to be in the Cust_Discount Table. I was trying to show a discount on the invoice that is stored in the Cust_Discount table. The report is based on the Master table. The discount worked great when there was a handling charge in the Charges table but in some cases there is no handling charge in the table and all and that is when I ran into trouble. Not sure where to turn. TOTAL = (.TTLWHSC - Discount + .vHandlingCharge) ACTUAL HANDLING DISCOUNT TOTAL EXPENSE CHARGE EXPENSE ──────────────────────────────────────── -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of A. Razzak Memon Sent: Monday, March 09, 2009 3:46 PM To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Report variable ? At 03:37 PM 3/9/2009, Steve Breen wrote: >Razzak, > >There in lay my issue. > >PON is in Master and Charges table but not in the Cust_Discount table. > >The relation between Master and Cust_Discount is CustNub2 > >This is where I start having issues. Well ... that is where you have to take care of your own data normalization issues and more ... R:BASE is doing what it is supposed to do. However, R:BASE will provide you with the appropriate -ERROR- message(s), so that you can correct things as deemed necessary. Very Best R:egards, Razzak.
