This is RWeb ?   ('I've been able to fix this with other users on-line'

 

If not,  are you dropping packets?  Etc..  Assuming this is 7.6 or V-8 and
causing this to happen.  I know I finally gave in a purchased a new Cisco
switch and A LOT of problems went away network wise. ;}

 

A bit of money 10/100/1000 and it seems to go up by users and then it
doubles on its way up.  Bell curve!

 

 

Sincerely,

Paul 

 

 

 

 

 

 

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Lawrence
Lustig
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 1:22 PM
To: RBASE-L Mailing List
Subject: [RBASE-L] - Pack Index and RB3 file size.

 

Hi all.

 

I have an application in which I'm getting occasional weirdness in the
indexes for one particular table, leading to incorrect results on some
queries.

 

I've been able to fix this with other users on-line by using the PACK INDEX
<IndexName>.  It's a big help to be able to do this with users in the
system.

 

Unfortunately, that only helps me AFTER the users have experienced and
noticed the problem.  I'm thinking of implementing an automatic PACK INDEX
routine to run at night to catch these things in advance.  This database
runs 24 hours, but it's less busy at night.  My only concern is that by
rebuiling these indexes repeatedly, my #3 file will grow in size.

 

Does anyone have experience with this?  Is that what happens?  Or does
R:Base somehow recycle the space currently used by an index?

--

Larry

Reply via email to