Who installed rbase on those new computers? Do the new CFGs match the ones on the other machines?
Dennis McGrath Software Developer QMI Security Solutions 1661 Glenlake Ave Itasca IL 60143 630-980-8461 [email protected] From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Karen Tellef Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 2:17 PM To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Slow database, 7.6 Ah yes the AV... I will ask them to check that. I have no idea what they use. Since they got new laptops, I wonder if that might be the problem. Karen -----Original Message----- From: Jason Kramer <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: RBASE-L Mailing List <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> Sent: Mon, Dec 3, 2012 1:50 pm Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Slow database, 7.6 Don't forget to make sure you have your AV software exclusions set properly. Jason Jason Kramer University Archives and Records Management 002 Pearson Hall (302) 831 - 3127 (voice) (302) 831 - 6903 (fax) On 12/3/2012 2:45 PM, Dan Goldberg wrote: Are you running any rule checking on the detail table? Dan Goldberg -----Original Message----- From: Albert Berry Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 11:41 AM To: RBASE-L Mailing List Subject: [RBASE-L] - Re: Slow database, 7.6 Those are the same settings on my client's server, so that's not the problem. The documentation suggests that every user needs a CFG file. Maybe someone else on the list can help - I ran out of ideas. Albert On 03/12/2012 12:29 PM, Karen Tellef wrote: I checked on the server. It already had "row locks" checked, and "column verify". Got excited for a second when I saw your post, but it looks okay. Wait time 4, wait interval 5, autorefresh level 0. Would this be only on the server, or do I need to have every workstation checked? I do not make active use of a configuration fileand I've never looked at it. Thanks for the suggestions! Karen
