Thanks, all for your suggestions.  Printing from a file seems to be a good
solution.  Just curious though, Troy, what  timeout setting are you
referring to?  In the dark recesses of my memory I seem to recall something
in Novell that holds the printer so that other jobs cannot slip pages into
a multi-page report.....but that was from pure dos capture days, I
think....

Bob C.





This is caused from the timeout setting beeing too short.
The best solution is what Bernie suggested below.  Print it to a file
first.

out tempfile.$$$
print rep1
print rep2
out screen

set width 240
out printer
type tempfile.$$$
out screen


===== Original Message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] at 1/09/02 2:09 pm
>Bob -
>
>        Print the two reports to a file and then print the file.
>
>Bernie
>======================================
>At 03:54 PM 1/9/2002 -0500, you wrote:
>>I have an unusual occurrence and wondered if anyone has had a similar
>>problem.  I have a dual DOS report that prints the first report then the
>>second report and it all links up on the same page.
>>OUT PRINTER
>>PRINT REPORT1
>>PRINT REPORT2
>>OUT SCREEN
>>There is no report footer in the first repot nor a form feed.  Lines are
>>set to 0 on first report.  This has worked fine for 4 years and now there
>>is a form feed after the first report prints.  This ONLY happens when it
is
>>printing to a network queue, works OK when directly to LPT1.  Tried this
on
>>several printers....  Looked at network settings and printer settings,
>>nothing new.  Network adminisrator (Novell) made no changes that he will
>>attest to......
>>Any ideas?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Bob Castanaro
>>
>>
>>================================================






================================================
TO SEE MESSAGE POSTING GUIDELINES:
Send a plain text email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the message body, put just two words: INTRO rbase-l
================================================
TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the message body, put just two words: UNSUBSCRIBE rbase-l

Reply via email to