Charlie & all: I've been running 6.5++ for Windows (and before that 6.1) on W2K and NT for some time, server (multi-user database) and clients. Getting rid of SERVER.RBG was the best change, even at the expense of concurrency licensing!
My experience has been that this package runs WAY better on W2K than it ever did on '95 and '98 clients. No more desktop crashes if the app does misbehave. I haven't yet found an excuse to fix anything with R:Scope- the database always seems to be left in good shape. But if the IT staff are just beginning to use their first "PRO" series OS, they'll have the kinds of issues you report related to folder rights, temp file placement, profile management, environment variables, etc. W2K is not "wide-open"- it's designed for a managed environment, as was NT. This may not apply to you, but I thought I'd pass along the idea... John A. CP wrote: > Is there a patch that needs to be installed for Rbase 6.5++ to work on > Windows 2000? Many of the users at the office keep getting windows error > whenever they try anything inside of Rbase. Sometimes data is even lost at > the expense of these errors. > > Charlie > ================================================ > TO SEE MESSAGE POSTING GUIDELINES: > Send a plain text email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > In the message body, put just two words: INTRO rbase-l > ================================================ > TO UNSUBSCRIBE: send a plain text email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > In the message body, put just two words: UNSUBSCRIBE rbase-l
begin:vcard n:Ashby;John tel;fax:977-2999 tel;work:977-2920 x-mozilla-html:FALSE url:http://www.slu.edu/services/IMC/ org:Saint Louis University;Information Technology Services version:2.1 email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] title:Director, Educational Technology adr;quoted-printable:;;221 N. Grand Blvd.=0D=0AXavier Annex room 100;St. Louis;MO;63103;USA fn:John M. Ashby end:vcard
