I just got an email from Microsoft a few days ago saying that SP2 was released to manufacturing, so I would be reasonably sure most (note MOST) of the beta,RC1,RC2 versions problems have been addressed, which would explain the several week delay in its' release...
----- Original Message ----- From: "A. Razzak Memon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "RBG7-L Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, August 23, 2004 9:30 AM Subject: [RBG7-L] - Re: SP2 for Windows XP > > Follow up ... > > We have just updated one of our XP Pro test machines with SP2 and > there is no problem running R:BASE 7.1 for Windows (UPD 77), > R:BASE 7.1 for Windows Runtime (UPD 77), R:Compiler 7.1 (UPD 77), > R:BASE 7.5 for Windows, R:BASE 7.5 for Windows Runtime, > R:Compiler 7.5 and R:Scope 7.5. > > We'll keep you all posted if we find anything unusual. > > Very Best R:egards, > > Razzak. > > > At 09:12 AM 8/23/2004 -0400, Stan Loo wrote: > > >I am considering SP2 for Windwos XP, but am unsure about its compatibility > >with RBW 7x or RBW 6.5++. Does anybody have a success story to share, or > >any advice regarding this potentail dilemma? > > Stan, > > Windows XP Service Pack 2: Install With Care > http://www.crn.com/sections/breakingnews/breakingnews.jhtml?articleId=23905071 > > IBM tells employees not to install Windows XP update > http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/08/09/HNdontinstallxp_1.html > > Initial Windows XP SP2 fallout limited > http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/08/12/HNxpfallout_1.html > > IT Managers: Windows XP Update Not a Priority > http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1631671,00.asp > > We have NOT tested R:BASE 7.x or 6.5++ on SP2 for XP. > > Very Best R:egards, > > Razzak. >
