Well, as usual, I am the booboo!  I had another order by in the listbox
definition which countered the one in the view!  I really must get more
sleep...  Good night :)



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Javier
> Valencia
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 10:59 PM
> To: RBG7-L Mailing List
> Subject: [RBG7-L] - RE: Order By in a View Definition
> 
> Claudine:
> I have run into this before, try:
> EDIT USING formname ORDER BY company_name ASC, invoice_nb ASC
> And see if it helps...
> Javier,
> 
> Javier Valencia, PE
> President
> Valencia Technology Group, L.L.C.
> 14315 S. Twilight Ln, Suite #14
> Olathe, Kansas 66062-4578
> Office (913)829-0888
> Fax (913)649-2904
> Cell (913)915-3137
> ================================================
> Attention:
> The information contained in this message and or attachments is intended
> only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain
> confidential and/or privileged material.  Any review, retransmission,
> dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
> this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient
> is prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender
> and
> delete the material from all system and destroy all copies.
> ======================================================
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Claudine
> Robbins
> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2005 10:51 PM
> To: RBG7-L Mailing List
> Subject: [RBG7-L] - Order By in a View Definition
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I defined a view with an order by.  The view is indeed sorted by
> company_name, invoice_nb, however when I create a variable listbox based
> on
> the view, it is no longer sorted and no other 'order by' makes it right
> (edi
> using formname ord by company_name, invoice_nb gets the same unordered
> result as edi using formname).  I did move the fields around as they were
> placed in the listbox, so I'm being lazy <g> and instead of trying to
> change
> it, I'm wondering if that could be the problem...
> 
> Claudine :)

Reply via email to