|
Also, make
sure that the ORDER BY clause in your statement does not conflict with the
breaks in the report; I found that if you want to use and ORDER BY clause in
your statement, it must include first the exact order of the breaks and then
the additional sort. Javier, Javier Valencia, PE President Valencia
Technology Group, L.L.C. 14315 S.
Twilight Ln, Suite #14 Olathe, Kansas
66062-4578 Office
(913)829-0888 Fax (913)649-2904 Cell
(913)915-3137 ================================================ Attention: The information
contained in this message and or attachments is intended only for the
person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential
and/or privileged material. Any
review, retransmission, dissemination or
other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon, this information
by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited.
If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the
material from all system and destroy all copies. ====================================================== -----Original
Message----- Alastair I bet
Emmitt is right - he usually is - but just in case, what you're describing
would also be consistent with damaged indexes. Backup
the database Do a
PACK KEYS on the database See if
that makes a difference David Blocker -----
Original Message -----
From: Alastair Burr
Sent: Tuesday, February 22,
2005 6:59 AM Subject:
[RBG7-L] - Problem with reports (continued...) Last
month I was having problems with a report that I could not get to print all the
data although if I used a where clause to select approximately half the data I
could run the report against each half with no problems. I
now have another report where the same thing happens. This time the report,
from the same database, runs against a different selection of data from a
different driving view. In
both cases: The
report runs against a view; The
data is written to a text file; I
have removed all sort definitions from the view; The
report variables do various lookups and concatenations but nothing very
exciting; There
are multiple break points to sort the data in the report; The
failure seems to occur at around 30,000 records; Browsing
all the data directly from the view and sorting that is no problem; There
is plenty of free disk space; The
results looks perfect with only half the data selected; I
am getting no error messages. In
one case I use an additional sort clause to sort the detail section's data. The
output files are quite large: one would be around 16mb but the other is nearer
only 8mb. (The "halves" come in at 9.7mb & 5.9mb in one case
and 4.5mb & 3.7mb in the other.) I have other reports that run to
close to 7mb. R:Base
seems to "stop working" rather than "hang". I can see some
disk activity as if data is still being accessed but the output file remains at
a fixed size no matter how much longer I wait (hours, even). I can disconnect
the database, close the R:>, open and/or close the Database Browser but not
do much else and then I do have to kill R:Base. After that the output
files are perfectly readable only missing the last part of the data. I
am using the latest beta (#80/W98SE) but I think this has been happening for
some time although I have a feeling that earlier versions of the reports worked
months, maybe as much as a year, ago - but I may not have noticed the problem
then. Does
anybody have any ideas what I need to look for to correct this? Are there any
limits imposed by the report on sort depth? Or row numbers? Or output file size? Is
there any significance in the failure row count being close to 32,768? Thanks
in advance for any suggestions, Regards, ---------------------------------- |
- [RBG7-L] - Re: Problem with reports (continued...) Javier Valencia
- [RBG7-L] - Re: Problem with reports (continued...) Albert Berry
- [RBG7-L] - Re: Problem with reports (continued...) Alastair Burr
- [RBG7-L] - Re: Problem with reports (continued...... Albert Berry
- [RBG7-L] - Re: Problem with reports (continue... Alastair Burr
- [RBG7-L] - Re: Problem with reports (continued...) Emmitt Dove
- [RBG7-L] - Re: Problem with reports (continued...... Alastair Burr
- [RBG7-L] - Re: Problem with reports (continued...... Emmitt Dove
- [RBG7-L] - Re: Problem with reports (continue... Alastair Burr
- [RBG7-L] - Re: Problem with reports (cont... Alastair Burr
- [RBG7-L] - Re: Problem with reports ... Lawrence Lustig
