OK, that 'splains it...  I'm gonna make it simple and name it anything but
RATE <g>...

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MikeB
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:18 PM
To: RBG7-L Mailing List
Subject: [RBG7-L] - Re: Reserved Words

Ok.. RATE was a bad example because of RATE1, RATE2, and RATE3 being
Reserved
words, but the rule still applies that you could use RATE1x, RATE2x, or
RATE3x,
where x is another character without any conflicts.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "claudinerobbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RBG7-L Mailing List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 7:08 PM
Subject: [RBG7-L] - Re: Reserved Words


> I said RStyle highlights "it" meaning RATE.
>
> Are you saying that RATE1 can be used although it is used in a function?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of MikeB
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 5:57 PM
> To: RBG7-L Mailing List
> Subject: [RBG7-L] - Re: Reserved Words
>
> I'm thinking you are confusing the rule (or I am?).
>
> AFAIK, You wouldn't want to name anything 3 or 4 characters total length
> that
> would be the first 3 or 4 characters of a reserved word, as you know RBase
> interprets that as the full length reserved word, but you could use the
> first 3
> or 4 characters of any reserved word as long as an additional character
was
> added that distinguished it from the Reserved word.
>
> Let's use the RATE example.
>
> You would NOT want to name a column or object RAT or RATE, but RAT1 or
RATE1
> would be acceptable.
>
> I don't know how Claudine thought that RATE1 was highlighted in RBE.
>
> It does not highlight in mine, nor does RAT, RAT1, or RATE1.
> RATE by itself is the only thing that highlights.
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Alastair Burr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "RBG7-L Mailing List" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:44 PM
> Subject: [RBG7-L] - Re: Reserved Words
>
>
> > Mike,
> >
> > I thought that you had to keep the first 4 characters unique/different
> from
> > reserved words - or has that changed without my noticing it?
> >
> > At the same time, RATE1/2/3 obviously have 5 but the first 4 are the
same
> -
> > so I'm confused.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alastair.
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "MikeB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "RBG7-L Mailing List" <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 11:27 PM
> > Subject: [RBG7-L] - Re: Reserved Words
> >
> >
> > > But......  Rate1 <> Rate...
> > >
> > >   You can take any RBase Reserved word and add 1 letter to it and
RBase
> > won't
> > > complain because they are not equivlent...
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > From: "claudinerobbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "RBG7-L Mailing List" <[email protected]>
> > > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 6:23 PM
> > > Subject: [RBG7-L] - Re: Reserved Words
> > >
> > >
> > > > Alastair,
> > > >
> > > > Yes, I was thinking the same thing, better safe than sorry...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks :)
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Alastair
> > Burr
> > > > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 4:59 PM
> > > > To: RBG7-L Mailing List
> > > > Subject: [RBG7-L] - Re: Reserved Words
> > > >
> > > > Claudine,
> > > >
> > > > These are 3 functions that give interest rates - I would advise you
> not
> > to
> > > > use RATE if you can avoid it. It may work for you now but in the
> > future...
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Alastair.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > > From: "claudinerobbins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > > To: "RBG7-L Mailing List" <[email protected]>
> > > > Sent: Monday, March 21, 2005 10:37 PM
> > > > Subject: [RBG7-L] - Reserved Words
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > RATE1, RATE2 and RATE3 are reserved words, and even though RATE is
> not
> > on
> > > > > the list, RStyle highlights it as if it were. Does anyone know if
> > there is
> > > > > any danger in using this for a field name? (inherited from
> Oracle...).
> > > > >
> > > > > TIA,
> > > > >
> > > > > Claudine :)
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to