I know it's redundant but --
we use the second table for many analysis and it's convenient to have the
date there.
My customer does a little programming at the R> and he convinced me to have
it there.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Lawrence Lustig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "RBG7-L Mailing List" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2005 9:42 AM
Subject: [RBG7-L] - Re: Temp table refresh
It turned out that both tables have a date col, same name,
and although the dates are supposed to be the same, they weren't and
that's
why the added row didn't show.
If they have to be the same, why keep them in the second table -- assuming
it's
reasonable to change the database structure at this point.
--
Larry
