I just repacked four Shimano freehubs last week. There is no need to
pull the freehub. Its a little bit of a reach but quite doable.

A few years ago, I bought a table the the Denver Veloswap and sold all
my tubulars and associated wheels, Look-type racing pedals and shoes
(just SPD and platform now), freewheels, and freewheel hubs. I am
free!

Cassettes are a dramatic improvement. A broken Campy record freewheel-
hub axle broke a dropout on my older road bike. I spent $$$ getting
that dropout replaced and the frame repainted. All the other nice
cassette improvements (ease of removal, large inventory, etc) pale in
significance to not worrying about that issue.

On Dec 2, 6:07 pm, MichaelH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In 30 years of riding and overhauling bikes I have never had to use a
> six foot bar to remove a freewheel and I have never stripped one out,
> or the hub it was attached to.  Seven spd  13 -28 freewheels offer
> regularly spaced gears and when mated to a 50x40x28 or 26 offer a very
> wide range of useable gears.  Freewheels with a 12 small cog are most
> often racing sets 12-24 or less.,  but a 9 speed cassette, 12x 27, can
> be mated with smaller rings to provide about the same high gear and a
> decent low gear, 34x 27 for most road riding situations.  There is no
> need to widen the cog set out to 32 or 34, with the resulting wide
> gear jumps.  It is better to go to smaller rings, or a triple crank if
> you want to get down below 30 gear inches.  No the cranks don't know
> whether your using a freewheel or a cassette, but your legs know when
> the gears are spaced too far apart or have too small a range.  As for
> servicing, it is more work to overhaul a cassette hub than a
> freewheel.  The cassette requires disassembling all of the cogs, then
> pulling the freehub off to get to the bearings.  Quite doable for
> sure, but still a longer process than simply removing a freewheel.
> Michael
>
> On Dec 1, 7:14 pm, Steve Palincsar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Mon, 2008-12-01 at 15:17 -0800, MichaelH wrote:
> > > >From a technical pov - durability, shifting performance etc - there's
> > > not much difference.  I've logged tens or perhaps hundreds of
> > > thousands of miles on each without much problem with either.  I like
> > > the convenience of 7 spd hubs, available from IRD, with a triple
> > > crank; but with a double the Shimano  12 - 27 casette allows for a
> > > smaller outside ring, 48 or 46, and then an easier shift to a 34 or 32
> > > on the inside.  Freewheels are still cheaper and easier to service.
>
> > 7 speed IRD freewheels are more expensive than 7 speed Shimano
> > cassettes.  It's not much trouble removing and replacing a cassette:
> > I've never heard of anybody having to use a six foot cheater bar to
> > remove a cassette lockring, and I can't imagine ever stripping out the
> > removal slot on a cassette lockring.  I doubt there are many old timers
> > who haven't stripped a freewheel when trying to get it off, and I don't
> > think there are many tandem owners with freewheels who haven't had
> > trouble unscrewing them.
>
> > As for the advantages of compact cranks: cranks don't care whether the
> > sprockets in back are on a freewheel or a cassette.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to