Yes road=/=dirt, but maybe the same principle, just scaled up? Perhaps a 27.5+ would be better than a 29+ just due to how huge a tire you're getting into???
Cheers, David "it isn't a contest. Just enjoy the ride." - Seth Vidal On Sat, Apr 26, 2014 at 9:56 AM, Mike Schiller <[email protected]>wrote: > David, that may be a good size for roads. paved or smooth dirt, but rocky, > sandy and rutted roads are much faster and smoother on wider tires than > that. Just one ride on those 650B Thunder Burts convinced me otherwise. The > 29+ tires are really fast and smooth once you are rolling and especially > downhill, but climbing means more rolling resistance, and more rotating > weight to overcome. > > I'm waiting for the 650+ tires to come to market like WTB's 2.8" > Trailblazer. Slightly smaller in circumference than a 29 x 2.2 tire but > with 70 mm of width. They would work great on a Krampus since the BB is > pretty high already. > > ~mike > Carlsbad Ca. > > >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "RBW Owners Bunch" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
