Due to the current price hike I wouldn't buy the ti-railed Brooks
solely on the difference of weight. But if you have the funds and
intend to fit it to your long distance ride the Ti-rails superior
ability to dampen road buzz is very noticeable and worth the extra
dosh!

On 26 Okt, 15:37, James Warren <[email protected]> wrote:
> I have a Ti Brooks, because when I bought mine, I think they were only $120 
> while the normals were $70. Pretty good deal, worth it to save 150 grams or 
> whatever it is, because lighter is better. Not worth it now for the price 
> difference. Also, the Ti model at the time came in a color which looked 
> greyt.-----Original Message-----
> From: Bruce
> Sent: Oct 26, 2009 6:31 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [RBW] Re: Some Ti for Atlantis/Bombadil?weight weenies are not often 
> found on any leather saddle. The Ti models offer a jewelry cachet to a device 
> that really is just designed to hold your bottom while you pedal. It's less 
> elegant to think of it that way though :)
>
>
>
> I concur with Joel's observations.
>
> From:JoelMatthews <[email protected]>To:RBW Owners Bunch 
> <[email protected]>Sent:Mon, October 26, 2009 7:58:51 
> AMSubject:[RBW] Re: Some Ti for Atlantis/Bombadil?
> It is a point of rapt debate among weight weenies and those who are
> not.  I side with those who say the leather is so thick and otherwise
> so much the source of the qualities of a leather saddle that any
> slight difference in the properties of steel and Ti would be
> immeasurable.
> What drives the differences in leather saddles is the amount of
> leather used, shape of the saddle, and adding springs.
>
>
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to