I'm not anti helmet and if I know I'm going down I would choose to have a helmet on. The article as many suggests that cycling is dangerous and 59% better chance of surviving a terrible crash. Well .. trouble is the chance of me having that terrible crash is pretty insignificant. Regardless of that I was enjoying the article right up until it states we needed laws to force helmet use. That is the point I will stand up yet again and state that giving bureaucrats power over me in even more aspects of my life is unacceptable. They fail to break down the instances of sport riders to casual riders, computers etc.
Any my opinion only the article doesn't really tell me anything to make me thing the helmet is anymore useful on a bicycle that it is in the shower or walking down steps. Kelly On Sunday, November 22, 2015 at 9:02:05 PM UTC-6, Eric Norris wrote: > > Not that this is going to change a single mind on the subject, but it is > perhaps of interest to some: > > https://www.facs.org/media/press-releases/2015/haider > > And yes, I realize that the helmet and non-helmet camps have firmly > established their entrenched positions, which have been expressed many > times on this forum. > > --Eric Norris > campyo...@me.com <javascript:> > www.campyonly.com > campyonlyguy.blogspot.com > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
