Richard - makes sense on the clem, but is the proto hunqapillar part of the new design? would hate to hear it is becoming less of a trial bike with a lower bb and longer cs.
On Sunday, October 2, 2016 at 6:39:07 PM UTC-7, Richard Rios wrote: > > In regaurd to clem jr as an option, I know many here will disagree with > this but long chainstays and a lowish bottom bracket in my experience > didn't make for a great off road ride. This is based of a good bit of time > spent abord a proto hunqapillar with 650bees and long cs. I would boil it > down this way in terms of ride quality what are you looking for. Smooth and > stable Rivendell. speedier and playful Surly. Both great bikes but > different priorites wise. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
