A bit late to this, sorry. But the Deacon asked me off-list about Three 
Speed Mountain Bike Resources, and as a (semi-competent) go-to for things 
three speeds, I figure I should say *something.*

Alas, there is no "go-to" list for three speed mountain biking, but to 
cover some of the points brought up in this thread:


   - *Why just three for an IGH (internally geared hub) vs 5, 11, 14, 
   infinity? *Well, I think Deacon Patrick nailed it on the head when 
   talking about *simplicity*. Yes, you will not get the range of something 
   bigger (whether IGH or derailleur) but you think *less* about shifting. 
   Not as "pure" as a single speed, but not as "corrupt" as a 3x11 setup. 
   Also, *three speed hubs are cheap*, relatively speaking (not counting 
   the cost of building a wheel if need be.) Heck, you can go to your local 
   bike co-op and probably find a bin of old AW hubs and get a functional one 
   for next-to-nothing. You aren't going to find that with a bigger IGH. And 
   even if you do, there are other costs: I "scored" an Alfine 11 hub for 
   nothing a couple years back, back when they were still like $600 MSRP. But 
   it didn't come with a shifter, and that's like $150* alone.* Heck, you 
   could get the AW hub plus shifter and other bits for that much.
   - *The difference between older (pre Sunrace) Sturmey Archer AW three 
   speed hubs vs new (Sunrace). *Yes, the old AW hub had that annoying 
   "neutral" that could happen, but that was usually either because a) the 
   cable/indicator chain was incorrectly adjusted b) standing up when 
   pedalling (frame flexes and pulls cable out of adjustment) or c) a 
   combination of the two. And even the "mediocre" AW hubs of the later 
   Sturmey Archer years are still *good. *There are plenty of bikes still 
   running old AW hubs. The one on my Superbe is from 1954 and runs great. But 
   I also don't pedal while standing up! ;-)
   - *Torque. *The problem with most IGHs are their tolerance of torque. 
   For most old hubs, it's not recommended to go under a 2:1 ratio. Some 
   people have gone under and not had any problems. A few destroyed their 
   hubs. I think a lot has to do with "rider input", like weight and riding 
   style. A lighter rider will probably have less issues with destroying a hub 
   if they go under the 2:1 ratio
   - *Gearing.* An old AW is simple, and limiting. The low you're going to 
   safely get is going to be upper-30's (gear-inches). That's not the low-low 
   of mid-teens you can get from some modern drivetrains, but it is not bad. 
   Portland isn't exactly flat, and I climb the hills with my Raleigh Superbe. 
   The other day I went up Mount Tabor with grades as high as 7%, and managed. 
   I did a tour a few years back in the Driftless Region of SW Wisconsin with 
   Pondero and GravelDoc on a loaded three speed and managed some 8% grinds. 
   No, it's not as optimal as the 15 gear-inch bike climb, and no, I wouldn't 
   do a sustained 20 mile climb with a 7% grade, but it worked for what I did.
   - *Those Old Spokes Home 3 Speed MTBs: *They look SWEET! I want one now. 
   Deacon, maybe just order one of theirs for experimentation? ;-) And I 
   highly doubt they would sell bikes like that if they needed constant 
   servicing. They've proven reliable for them, and they put them through the 
   paces, including winter.
   - *About winter:* Yes, AW hubs work in extreme conditions. My friend 
   Keith has ridden AW equipped bikes through the dead of Edmonton winter for 
   years. He does use a lighter weight oil for those months (which is one of 
   the advantages to the older oil-filled AW hubs of the pre-Sunrace takeover.)

So, should one experiment? Yes! 

Now, I don't think a three speed is going to fulfill all the needs for a 
"modern" mountain bike, especially if one is going to do lots of steep 
climbing. But people have been bashing about on three speeds for rough 
stuff for eons, like the UK based Rough Stuff Fellowship. They've been 
going at it since the 50's. Back then I'm sure most of the member's bikes 
had three speed hubs, yet they went all sorts of crazy places in the 
English countryside, up rough and rude paths. Of course, there was some 
pushing involved, and they didn't expect to do 8% grades at a high cadence. 
But they still *did it.*

And anyone who has read this far and is still interested: Seek out the work 
of Geoff Apps, considered the father of UK mountain biking, working at the 
same time as the Repack folks. His custom machines usually used drum brakes 
and hub gears, and he pedalled through all sorts of terrain and conditions.

Finally, why can't that Paul Melvin only take a cog up to 20 teeth? ;-)

yours,
Shawn

No one actually looks at email signatures anymore, but here goes nothing:
http://urbanadventureleague.wordpress.com/
http://societyofthreespeeds.wordpress.com/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/urbanadventureleaguepdx/ 
http://bikesspottedpdx.tumblr.com/
http://www.instagram.com/urbanadventureleaguepdx/
http://urbanadventureleague.storenvy.com/
Un-electronic mail goes here: P O Box 14185, Portland OR 97293-0185

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to