>From the horse's (his/Grant's) mouth, the main compartment is: 9.5 inches wide, 7 inches front-to-back, and about 8 inches tall.
Or 240 x 178 x 200. (mm) (W x L x D) This is as wide as a large Ortlieb, but both deeper and longer front to back: 240 x ~135 x 175 (W x L x D). (Length is an average because the front of the bag is curved; sides are 120, center is 150.) Narrower than a small Berthoud, but longer (front to back) and equally deep: 270 x 145 x 200 (W x L x D). About the removal, couldn't you use washers small enough that the leather sleeves will slide over them if the bag is lifted slightly, but still prevent the leather sleeves from sliding over them if there is any kind of weight in the bag? And yes, the bolts on the front of the rack are M8s (perhaps with built-in washers, judging from the photo on benscycle.net) I am getting one! Gernot On Feb 12, 1:47 am, William Henderson <[email protected]> wrote: > Seriously eyeing this bag. I may go check it out this weekend if I'm > feeling up to the hour BART ride. My questions: > > - How big is the main compartment? (will it fit, say, an iPad?) > - How easy is it to take on and off? (easy enough so that I can take > it off the bike each time I lock up?) > - How much water can it take? > > wc. > > On Feb 10, 12:00 pm, Mike <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I noticed they posted some pictures and a price for the Sackville > > BarSack. It looks nice. I'm not sure how it will effect handling. If I > > didn't have a Berthoud already I'd consider trying this. > > >http://www.rivbike.com/products/show/sackville-barsack/20-208 > > > Anyone order one yet? > > > --mike -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
