Ahh did you replace the H for the L? I remember you did a lovely write up about the H.
On Thursday, September 13, 2018 at 1:57:23 PM UTC-4, Zed Martinez wrote: > > Hey Doug, having owned one of each: > > If for you (the generic you, not necessarily actually you) the Clem is a > trail/rough-road bike, and you have good flexibility, the H makes more > sense. It's more rigid, and very obviously shows its old MTB inspiration. > > If for you the Clem is a commuter and city bike, the L offers the easier > step-through, an easier way to carry it through doors (by grabbing the loop > of the frame. This has actually been way handier than I expected when I > switched), and somewhat less often mentioned is it makes the bike look a > lot more laid back for the same geometry and at least where I am drivers > are considerably more likely to stop and yield for me, and I get more > smiles from people. It gives that more 'urbane' look and there are benefits > to that. > > If you like nice details, the newer Clem L frames have the heart lug at > the seat tube, and that's a fancier touch. > > > On Thursday, September 13, 2018 at 1:46:16 PM UTC-4, Doug H. wrote: >> >> I’ve been wondering what the appeal is of the L as opposed to the H Clem. >> Is it just the ease of stepping through/onto and off of the bike? >> Doug > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
