Hmm, not sure how that would have helped me? I’d of had no useable frame of 
reference. The Clem is so long I might have discounted it out of hand. I was 
trying to get more comfortable while upright & would not have thought it 
possible given the effective top tube measurement. And then on top of that the 
bike I was considering came with a 13cm stem! But a few pedal strokes wa all it 
took.:)

Sent from my iPhone

> On Apr 26, 2022, at 4:10 PM, Joe Bernard <joerem...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Basically the trick to purchasing any Clem - especially used - is to get the 
> effective toptube number and start from there. I know Grant hates this advice 
> but you gotta have some kinda guideline if you're not able to ride it first. 
> 
>> On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 12:45:23 PM UTC-7 Doug H. wrote:
>> When I spoke to Grant about the Clem a few years ago he suggested the 59 
>> would work well for me but I decided on a 52 in large part for the wheel 
>> size. But, that conversation may have been based on the first gen geometry 
>> which has changed.
>> Doug
>> 
>>> On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 3:23:04 PM UTC-4 rmro...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> Interesting observation. I love the fit of my 52 Clem but wonder if I 
>>> “should” be on a 59? A little more than a fistful of seatpost showing and 
>>> with a 130mm (I know!) FacePater & 650 wide Tosco. The stem is as high as 
>>> it can go. So a 59 could work I guess but with a much shorter stem? 
>>> According to the size suggestions you reference I should definitely be on a 
>>> 52. But based on PBH I could probably be comfortable on a 59. 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>>>> On Apr 26, 2022, at 1:15 PM, Joe Bernard <joer...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>> I wish they would cut this part from the product description:
>>> 
>>>> 45cm / 27.5-inch new mountain bikey size wheels. Typical rider height: 5-0 
>>>> to 5-5
>>>> 52cm / 27.5-inch new mountain bikey size wheels. Typical rider height: 5-5 
>>>> to 5-11
>>>> It's from the first batch and doesn't even correspond to the PBH recs 
>>>> elsewhere in the description. Nobody 5 feet tall is riding a current 45cm 
>>>> Clem L. 
>>>> 
>>>>> On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 8:34:32 AM UTC-7 Doug H. wrote:
>>>>> Good catch Joe. I think that is a good change and makes sense with the 
>>>>> loooong  chainstays.
>>>>> Doug
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 11:28:32 AM UTC-4 Joe Bernard wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> To clarify, the 45cm Clem L is a 27.5/650b bike now. And longer ETT than 
>>>>>> the old 26-ers. 
>>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 5:23:06 AM UTC-7 Doug H. wrote:
>>>>>>> Keith,
>>>>>>> I ride a 52 Clem and am 5'10" with an 83 PBH. I could ride a 59 I think 
>>>>>>> but I prefer the 650b wheels. The 45 Clem has 26 inch wheels while the 
>>>>>>> 59 has 700c. It's so cool that wheel size scales to frame size! That 
>>>>>>> you can ride multiple sizes is one advantage (of several) to the low 
>>>>>>> top tube bikes. Here is a photo of mine set up for me and you can see I 
>>>>>>> have plenty of seat post showing.
>>>>>>> Doug
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, April 26, 2022 at 7:30:04 AM UTC-4 Bicycle Belle Ding 
>>>>>>>> Ding! wrote:
>>>>>>>> Keith, here’s a photo of my Platypus; you can see how little seat post 
>>>>>>>> is showing. But I promise it’s the right size!
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 26, 2022, at 7:27 AM, Bicycle Belle Ding Ding! 
>>>>>>>>>> <jonasa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Hi Keith, I have the 52 Clem and the 55 Platy. They are completely 
>>>>>>>>> different bikes and the sizing is confusing because the 52 Clem feels 
>>>>>>>>> bigger than the 55 Platypus. I am 5’6”, with an 81 cm PBH. 
>>>>>>>>> Technically, I would be sized for the top end of the 50 Platy, but I 
>>>>>>>>> like to size up if I can. I have very little seat post showing, but I 
>>>>>>>>> can’t imagine riding the smaller-sized Platypus. I love how the 55 
>>>>>>>>> Platypus fits me. The Clem also feels right to me, but it took a lot 
>>>>>>>>> of experimenting with stems before I settled into it. I think I have 
>>>>>>>>> an 80 on the Clem and a 100 on the Platy. After riding the Clem, my 
>>>>>>>>> Platypus will feel a little cramped to me at the start of the ride. I 
>>>>>>>>> think a 50 would definitely feel too small after riding a 52 Clem. 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> It would be helpful if you could test ride, but these bikes are rare 
>>>>>>>>> as hen’s teeth, aren’t they? People are really nice about letting 
>>>>>>>>> other Listers test ride a Rivendell, so maybe post a “Want to test 
>>>>>>>>> ride” thread? There might be someone with a 45 Clem L or a 55 Platy 
>>>>>>>>> in your area who would let you throw a leg over it for a hot minute…
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Do you have any leads on the bikes you’re considering?  I hope so! I 
>>>>>>>>> don’t often see Cheviots or Platypuses for sale and it will be a long 
>>>>>>>>> wait until Rivendell gets their next shipments. 
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Monday, April 25, 2022 at 10:38:22 PM UTC-4 Keith Swanson wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> I have a 52 Clem L that feels a bit large for me and am trying to 
>>>>>>>>>> decide whether to replace it with a 50 Platypus or a 45 Clem L (If 
>>>>>>>>>> anyone has a 50 Cheviot frame in silver or blue I would be 
>>>>>>>>>> interested).  Does anyone know if there's much of a difference 
>>>>>>>>>> between the two sizes?  The 52 Clementine I test rode felt much 
>>>>>>>>>> different than the one I have now.
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in 
>>>>>>>>> the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit 
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/rbw-owners-bunch/2ePNxQS47BE/unsubscribe.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to 
>>>>>>>>> rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>>>>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/8d195e03-beb9-480e-9499-02d26cf25b8en%40googlegroups.com.
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>> 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>>>> email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/93e3ae75-47e7-46c0-9c9d-deadef519eean%40googlegroups.com.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/352b67ee-e275-4366-89ae-5dafb8eebd32n%40googlegroups.com.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/59A0D206-98F5-4644-A2FE-FEA5AC880C7D%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to