JJ thanks for sharing your experiences across several RR mechs, that's a 
lot of sampling. Sounds like you've found cage movement that works for you! 
Dig the pic as well, thank you. I agree the red decal is a bit much. 
Perhaps I'll scrape it off. 

Johnny, thanks for the link, that is an in-depth look at derailers I'd kind 
of forgotten about. It's a long one so here are some tidbits about cost and 
arrival, which I'm sure will change:

*6. How much will it cost?*

a. We don't know. Ideally we'll have a fancy first model, the SILVER OM-1; 
and then cheaper other models, maybe OM-2, OM-3. Maybe $300 for a fancy, 
and $30 for a plain? We have zero idea, but a derailer too expensive to buy 
is no fun and misses the point; and a super cheap derailer that doesn't 
account for the cost of developing and making it is ... not gonna happen. 
We'll just see.

*11. When?*

a. We're hoping the fancy by Spring 2023, and the plain by Fall 2023.

On Monday, August 22, 2022 at 8:00:40 PM UTC-4 Johnny Alien wrote:

> Riv is indeed making different tiers. I believe Grant said he wanted the 
> top level to be around $300 but a plain jane low level version for 
> something like $30.
>
>
> https://www.rivbike.com/blogs/grant-petersens-blog/late-may-silver-is-a-bugger-and-the-last-good-looking-rear-derailer
>
> On Monday, August 22, 2022 at 7:40:55 PM UTC-4 J J wrote:
>
>> I've been exclusively running low normal for a few years. Here's a pic of 
>> the XT M770 on my Hunqapillar. When I first started using Rapid Rise I had 
>> a few muscle memory misfires (getting the opposite of what I wanted when I 
>> moved the shift lever). It lasted a couple of weeks, but then it was like a 
>> flipping a switch in my brain and motor coordination. The logic just made 
>> so much sense, especially the consistency in left and right shifting, 
>> easier in one direction, harder in the other, on both sides. I run them 
>> with friction shifters only. It's like second nature.
>>
>> I've tried XTR 970, 960, 950 series, LX and Deore models, and XT 760 and 
>> 770. I sold a few of my still-too-large hoard of Rapid Rise on this forum. 
>> Never tried the Nexave. All of them felt good, the only differences being 
>> the typical Shimano hierarchical group gradations in materials, design, 
>> refinement, weight, etc. I don't see myself going back to high normal 
>> shifting. I've gotten rid of (almost) all of my high normal mechs.
>>
>> I have never experienced the issues that Eric (Norris) mentioned about 
>> low normal RDs not functioning well if they get mucked up. I maintain them 
>> no differently than how I ever treated high normal RDs. I've recently been 
>> riding in particularly wet and mucky conditions. It's as much of an issue 
>> as it is for high normal, which is to say, it has been a nonissue in my 
>> experience. There are probably numerous reasons Rapid Rise didn't succeed 
>> in the market. But common declarations about their supposed poor 
>> functionality for xyz reasons do not align with my experiences at all (and 
>> I can only talk to my own experiences). They're not harder (or easier) to 
>> set up than high normal. They index no worse (or better) than high normal. 
>> They're no less (or more) robust than high normal.  
>>
>> Some purists thumb their noses at the overwrought design of the 770 and 
>> 970, the black Deore, and others. Not silver enough, not polished enough, 
>> too much paint, too flashy, etc. I think they look cool. And I will take 
>> the functionality of these with their ostensibly dowdier looks *anytime* 
>> over not using Rapid Rise because they're insufficiently attractive. I 
>> don't typically ogle my RDs while I'm riding :) The silvery Nexave looks 
>> great, though the red Megarange is a bit jarring to my eyes. I'm sure it 
>> functions as wonderfully as all the other Rapid Rise models and I'd jump on 
>> it if I found one for $17! 
>>
>> I'm stoked about Rivendell's upcoming version. Thank goodness Grant and 
>> crew have enough gumption, principle, will, and sheer obstinacy to carry 
>> through on the project. It's only speculation, but I suspect Riv's derailer 
>> will be pretty pricey. NOS XT and XTR Rapid rise are increasingly rare, and 
>> $200 to $500 prices are not unusual on eBay, craigslist, and in independent 
>> bike shops that happen to have stock here and there. Used ones in great 
>> condition also fetch a lot of $$. I would not be surprised if Riv's is 
>> within that range. Maybe Riv will produce different tiers? Fingers crossed 
>> that they will see the light of day asap. Whatever price it ends up being, 
>> I'll try to be the first in line for one.
>>
>>
>> [image: xt rapid rise.jpeg]
>>
>> On Monday, August 22, 2022 at 4:09:31 PM UTC-4 campyo...@me.com wrote:
>>
>>> Path Less Pedaled just did an entire video episode on Rapid Rise/Low 
>>> Normal derailleurs that’s definitely worth watching.
>>>
>>> One point that came up in the comments from viewers is that shifting to 
>>> lower gears is done entirely through the strength of the spring in the 
>>> derailleur. Move the shifter to release more cable, and the *spring* pushes 
>>> the chain onto a larger cog. In practice, according to people who had used 
>>> RR/LN extensively, was that normal stuff that happens to derailleurs (they 
>>> get dirty or muddy, or need lubrication) makes that spring’s job harder, 
>>> with the result that it doesn’t work as well. 
>>>
>>> Shifting to a larger cog also benefits from a slight decrease in 
>>> pedaling pressure while shifting (again, to make the spring’s job easier). 
>>> That’s not always possible when you’re grinding up a steep incline and need 
>>> to grab a lower gear. This may be part of the reason why RR/LN was phased 
>>> out … along with the fact that it was “different” in an industry that 
>>> mostly prizes conformity.
>>>
>>> Full disclosure: I’ve never used a RR/LN setup, although I do ride 
>>> almost exclusively with friction-shifting downtube levers.
>>>
>>> --Eric Norris
>>> campyo...@me.com
>>> Insta: @CampyOnlyGuy
>>> YouTube: YouTube.com/CampyOnlyGuy 
>>>
>>> On Aug 22, 2022, at 12:46 PM, Eric Marth <eric...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Do you run a Rapid Rise derailer? Do you like it? Have you had one 
>>> before and just didn't get it? What's the *deal?*
>>>
>>> With all the commotion over Rivendell's plan to build their own 
>>> production low-normal derailer I figured I'd try one out for myself. The 
>>> first one I picked up was an XTR RD-M951 which I suspected had a bent 
>>> pulley cage, some of you may remember I posted about this mech a few weeks 
>>> ago. 
>>>
>>> I found this Nexave on eBay for $17 so figured I'd give it a shot. This 
>>> model, to my mind, is *the* classic rapid rise derailer. Silver, shiny, 
>>> long cage, external guide pulley, pivoting cable guide for a short bit of 
>>> housing over the rear dropout. Grant mentioned that this was his favorite 
>>> model, cosmetically. I like it, too. 
>>>
>>> So far I haven't put many miles on it but no complaints. I like getting 
>>> into the easier gears with a light touch. I'm running the derailer on my 
>>> Appaloosa with a Silver 38/24 crank and a 9-speed 11-36 cassette. It's 
>>> wired up to the original Suntour Power Thumb shifters which are mounted in 
>>> the reversed, under-hand style also known as the Riv-versed or Rivendell 
>>> brifter style. 
>>>
>>> With the reverse-mounted shifters I did like pushing the lever away from 
>>> me to get an easier gear with a high-normal derailer installed. That made 
>>> sense. Pulling the lever to me for an easier gear is taking a bit of 
>>> getting used to but the action required is so light that it's not a problem 
>>> so far. 
>>>
>>> Unfortunately, I haven't yet been in a situation where I'm climbing and 
>>> experience a mis-shift under torque resulting in the derailer bumping me to 
>>> an easier gear. I'm looking forward to it, really. 
>>>
>>> One thing I can't get my head wrapped around is why Grant and Rivendell 
>>> want to make this happen and go through so much trouble and expense. It is 
>>> quite a complicated undertaking. It seems if you're into low-normal 
>>> derailers they're out there if you look hard enough and have some patience. 
>>> Perhaps it's just what they do and what they're about. They want something 
>>> to exist that has gone out of production, they make it so, and that is the 
>>> purest expression of their ethos and what they love about bikes and 
>>> components. "Isn't this great? People should be able to find and use 
>>> these!" 
>>>
>>> <IMG_1983.JPG>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to rbw-owners-bun...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/892c029a-4efd-4b00-9dc7-840361116a39n%40googlegroups.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/892c029a-4efd-4b00-9dc7-840361116a39n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>> <IMG_1983.JPG>
>>>
>>>
>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/264b7b5b-2951-4a6a-8b31-46de4c08dc32n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to