Isn't Grant's intention with these very long reaches to the bar, to allow bars with long sweepback on a stem of reasonable length and with a lot of rise?
In my own case, with short arms and long torso and a drop bar level with or below saddle, I need a very undersquare frame (60 X 56 c-c is perfect) for a level top tube; of courses, if I were to use a non-drop bar with a lot of sweepback, things could be different. On Sat, Feb 24, 2024 at 11:23 AM Josh C <getjoshchamb...@gmail.com> wrote: > I could fit on anything between 59-64cm with the low top tube but I'd pick > the 59 just to keep the overall length down. These bikes are already crazy > long, I don't want to make it longer unnecessarily, a 64 clem is like > riding an 80s Lincoln Towncar. I don't understand the draw of sizing up. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rbw-owners-bunch/CALuTfgu5jTaTQ1JhcrX4-ncWw9Zdk-xqiz6fSWhUoYFWtogH%2Bg%40mail.gmail.com.
