On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 8:23 AM, Thomas Lynn Skean <thomaslynnsk...@comcast.net> wrote: > Oh, it just occurred to me that if I had a "pop-top" stem, I wouldn't > have to adjust a threadless headset each time I did this. So the > threaded/threadless choice isn't really much of a difference. Maybe > it'd take more bolt-tightening on the threadless setup. But that's no > big deal. And I'd only need one stem, probably (since I'm using the > same kind of stem on all of my cockpits anyway). > > As it turns out, of course, I like the *look* of quill stems much > better anyway. Given that I'm reading and posting to *this* list, I'm > sure that surprises no one. (Dirt Drop lovers, unite!) > > So, I guess that if I had a pop-top stem with a threadless headset, > the up-side would be that I'd need only one stem. The only downside > for this multi-cockpit notion (or any other notion, for that matter) > would be that I'd have a pop-top stem and a threadless headset!
You could get one of the nitto threaded->threadless adapters and then put a threadless stem on it like normal. Then you could have the poptop stem you'd want. -sv -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group. To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
