My point exactly. But it is interesting to see. FWIW I wouldn't ever use GP's 
bike for any reference as they, each and every one, are more or less 
"test-mules" for trying things out. Hence my giving him a pass on using 
zip-ties-he wants a quick connect and go kind of set-up. 
Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry

-----Original Message-----
From: JimD <rasterd...@comcast.net>
Sender: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 08:37:00 
To: <rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To: rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RBW] What Makes the Rivendell

I like looking at the 'staff bikes' on the Riv site.
Grant's bikes have a fair number of 'things' on em.
Mark Abele's bikes tend to be spare.
There's no one way.
We do and ride what we like and what works.
-JimD

On Jan 8, 2011, at 1:06 PM  Jan 8, 2011, robert zeidler wrote:

> I agree with it all, what a great bike to make into what you want.
> The one thing I find quite amazing-this is an observation, not a
> critique-is, especially on Cyclofiend, the amazing amounts of stuff
> that people hang on their bikes.  It's like farkle city!
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 3:54 PM, JimD <rasterd...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> Well said Jim.
>> I wish I could find the thing I read from Douglas Brooks where he  
>> talks
>> about 'resolved' and 'resourcefull' bikes.
>> A Hampsten Tournesol Rando bike is an example of a resolved bike.
>> Everything is optimized for the function of long distance/unsupported
>> riding.
>> A Rivendell (pick any one) is a premier example of a 'resourceful'  
>> bike.
>> Grant designs great riding bikes that are flexibly configurable.  
>> They may be
>> aimed at different
>> primary riding domains (Roadeo vs Bombadil) but can be setup across  
>> a wide
>> range within the
>> design target domain.
>> Underlying this approach to the hardware is a sensibility for  
>> bicycling and
>> bicyclers that is wide
>> ranging - everything but racing.
>> For me this sensibility has enriched the experience of bicycling  
>> beyond the
>> bounds of my perspective during
>> my first 20 years of riding.  I was riding '10 speed racing bikes'  
>> and
>> should go fast, train, be like Eddy.
>> As I 'matured' I found the challenge of going fast and faster was  
>> getting
>> hard and harder.
>> I had to succumb to the dreaded triple to climb the hills around  
>> here.
>> Once I realized I wasn't racing. I started thinking about other  
>> approaches.
>> Having discovered Rivendell I'm riding more and having more fun  
>> than ever
>> before.
>> -JimD
>>
>>
>> On Jan 8, 2011, at 11:09 AM  Jan 8, 2011, CycloFiend wrote:
>>
>> on 1/7/11 12:06 PM, Kelly Sleeper at tkslee...@gmail.com wrote:
>> (great questions which ended with...)
>>
>> What makes the Rivendell Different.. how does one explain that  
>> difference to
>>
>> those that just see a steel antique looking bke?
>>
>> I think there have been a couple of handling or "discussion of trail"
>> threads where this has popped up before.  These are a couple points  
>> I've
>> probably made before...
>>
>> Rivendells (and I include all of the designs, not simply custom  
>> models) have
>> a similar quality of ride. While a Roadeo is different from a  
>> Bombadil,
>> there's an underlying set of design tenets which seems pretty  
>> consistent.
>> For me, in my riding conditions, they are superlative. They are  
>> stable,
>> predictable, solid handling bikes that generally keep me out of  
>> trouble, and
>> then react appropriately when I'm silly enough to get my self into  
>> it.  If
>> they didn't handle well, nothing else would matter.
>>
>> The handling and ride is a sum of a all parts. It isn't _JUST_  
>> trail, head
>> angle, bb height, chainstay length, angles, and length.  It's all  
>> of those
>> things.  You cannot just change one aspect and have the same bike.   
>> The
>> bicycles are a product of those variables, plus the things which  
>> Grant has
>> learned in the XX number of years of plotting out frames, testing  
>> them and
>> thinking pretty deeply about the results.
>>
>> The bicycle designs have grown to be incredibly versatile. Ten  
>> years ago,
>> the longer reach brakes weren't availalble. The clearances which we  
>> now
>> enjoy were only possible with canti brakes.  Finding a 28mm 700C  
>> tire was
>> difficult, let alone a higher quality 30mm+ tire. The limiting  
>> factors have
>> been the components, and Grant has always been pushing the envelope  
>> in this
>> particular corner of the bicycle world. Add to that his commitment  
>> to high
>> quality bags and racks and you end up with a useful and continually  
>> variable
>> design.  As I've repeated too many times, both my Quickbeam and  
>> Hilsen have
>> been errand bikes, road bikes, mountain bikes, race bikes and  
>> brevet bikes
>> in the time I've had them. Over the past couple years, I've grown  
>> to feel
>> that if a bicycle can't be fendered or adapted, it really is not a  
>> "bicycle"
>> in the true sense.  In other words, when people ask what my "road  
>> bike" is,
>> I kind of stare at them blankly.
>>
>> All of this could be done roughly, or quickly, or with a more  
>> industrial
>> design tenet, but the fact that Rivendell connects the tubes with  
>> lugs, has
>> small, undernoticed details and pays attention to decal fonts,  
>> paint colors,
>> and bicycle packaging (just to pick out a quick few) to the extent  
>> that they
>> do just locks them in for me. It distinguishes them as  
>> practitioners of a
>> craft.  It's important to me to support that.  The "finish" work is  
>> part of
>> the craft...part of the art of what they practice.
>>
>> I suppose it's easy to equate the outside, finishing layer with the  
>> whole.
>> The first thing someone notices is the paint layer, the contrasting  
>> colors,
>> the lugs.  While that's part of the equation, the strength lies  
>> underneath.
>>
>> - Jim
>>
>> --
>> Jim Edgar
>> cyclofi...@earthlink.net
>>
>> Cyclofiend Bicycle Photo Galleries - http://www.cyclofiend.com
>> Current Classics - Cross Bikes
>> Singlespeed - Working Bikes
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
>> Groups
>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
>>
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
>> Groups
>> "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com 
>> .
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.
>>
>
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google  
> Groups "RBW Owners Bunch" group.
> To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners- 
> bu...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> .
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en 
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bu...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to