You know what?  It tracks perfect, rides straight and true, even no hands. 
I'm going to just ride it.  :)

On Thursday, 13 September 2012 21:52:48 UTC-4, Amit Singh wrote:
>
> Aiight. I'll hit up Doug Fattic in the morning.  In the meanwhile I'll 
> continue riding BombaLove through the weekend.
>
> On Thursday, 13 September 2012 21:39:37 UTC-4, Jeremy Till wrote:
>>
>> I also hate to say it, but that was the first thing that crossed my mind 
>> when I saw the first photo.  I let it go because it's always hard to tell 
>> from a single photo, but now that I've seen another, I have to agree...that 
>> thing is bent man.  
>>
>> The fact that it's bent forward is interesting and concerning.  Forks are 
>> usually bent backwards from some type of crash, in which the front wheel is 
>> stopped by an obstacle and the weight of the bike bends the fork backwards 
>> under it.  Bending forward means that the bending force was solely 
>> vertical--like hopping off a curb carrying a lot of weight.  In any case, 
>> I'd be wary about loaded touring with that thing.  Chances are that now 
>> weakened, it would keep bending or even worse, crack at the crown.  
>>
>> Send it back to Riv, or else get the correct fork rake specs and have a 
>> framebuilder or well-equipped (i.e. with fork jig) LBS bend it back for 
>> you, and then keep an eagle eye on it.  Or just get a new fork.  I
>>
>> On Thursday, September 13, 2012 6:07:11 PM UTC-7, Amit Singh wrote:
>>>
>>> Bubba !!!  Why'd you drop this idea in my mind?!  
>>>
>>> Here's another photo:  http://www.flickr.com/photos/amisingh/7983927516/
>>>
>>> Can someone else tell me the fork is perfect and not to worry about it? 
>>>  GP, you'd be the supreme authority here, of course.
>>>
>>> So ... what are the implications if a fork is not perfect?  This bicycle 
>>> tracks perfect no hands, anything else to worry about?
>>>
>>> Amit
>>>
>>> On Thursday, 13 September 2012 18:51:39 UTC-4, William wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I hope that's just a photo illusion but the forks look bent.  The upper 
>>>> fork legs are not parallel with the headtube, in the photo.  Maybe in real 
>>>> life they are.  Careful!
>>>>
>>>> On Thursday, September 13, 2012 7:07:58 AM UTC-7, Amit Singh wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/amisingh/7980699538/
>>>>>
>>>>> Another Bombadil w/ 60mm tires and fenders.
>>>>>
>>>>> Converted from mountain bike to touring bike duty for my upcoming C&O 
>>>>> Canal / Allegheny Passage tour.
>>>>>
>>>>> Excited!
>>>>>
>>>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "RBW 
Owners Bunch" group.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msg/rbw-owners-bunch/-/dNEGFNSJvVEJ.
To post to this group, send email to rbw-owners-bunch@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
rbw-owners-bunch+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/rbw-owners-bunch?hl=en.

Reply via email to