On Feb 22, 2011, at 12:32 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > > On 22 February 2011 at 11:26, ken.willi...@thomsonreuters.com wrote: > | On 2/22/11 11:13 AM, "Dirk Eddelbuettel" <e...@debian.org> wrote: > | >Just a quick note to say that ... > | > > | >On 22 February 2011 at 10:53, ken.willi...@thomsonreuters.com wrote: > | >| got farther, so now I'm getting correct output from it. BTW, I changed > | >| the prereq on Rcpp from 0.9.0 to 0.8.6 since that's the latest public > | >| release. > | > > | >... this ain't so. Are you running an old R version that looks into a > | >versioned subtree of CRAN? Rcpp is at 0.9.1, its Archive/ has the > | >history up > | >from 0.6.0. See http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rcpp/index.html > | > | Oh! Looks like the GUI package installer in R.app was set to just show > | the latest OS X binary on CRAN, which is 0.8.6. Is there some reason > | that's trailing the source release? > > Crap, you're absolutely correct. Forgot about the OS X aspect, as well as my > mental note to bug Simon about the stone-old build, so doing that now. > > Simon: Are there are any reasons Rcpp is frozen on a version that is five > months old and five releases behind? >
Yes, it's not passing checks - it's that simple: http://www.R-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-prerel-macosx-ix86/Rcpp-00check.html And OS X is not the only place as you'll see when you look at http://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_Rcpp.html You may want to keep an eye on your check results ... Cheers, Simon > Thanks as always for keeping that builder running. > > Dirk > > -- > Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com > > _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
