On 22 February 2011 at 12:45, Simon Urbanek wrote: | | On Feb 22, 2011, at 12:32 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > | > On 22 February 2011 at 11:26, ken.willi...@thomsonreuters.com wrote: | > | On 2/22/11 11:13 AM, "Dirk Eddelbuettel" <e...@debian.org> wrote: | > | >Just a quick note to say that ... | > | > | > | >On 22 February 2011 at 10:53, ken.willi...@thomsonreuters.com wrote: | > | >| got farther, so now I'm getting correct output from it. BTW, I changed | > | >| the prereq on Rcpp from 0.9.0 to 0.8.6 since that's the latest public | > | >| release. | > | > | > | >... this ain't so. Are you running an old R version that looks into a | > | >versioned subtree of CRAN? Rcpp is at 0.9.1, its Archive/ has the | > | >history up | > | >from 0.6.0. See http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/Rcpp/index.html | > | | > | Oh! Looks like the GUI package installer in R.app was set to just show | > | the latest OS X binary on CRAN, which is 0.8.6. Is there some reason | > | that's trailing the source release? | > | > Crap, you're absolutely correct. Forgot about the OS X aspect, as well as my | > mental note to bug Simon about the stone-old build, so doing that now. | > | > Simon: Are there are any reasons Rcpp is frozen on a version that is five | > months old and five releases behind? | > | | Yes, it's not passing checks - it's that simple: | http://www.R-project.org/nosvn/R.check/r-prerel-macosx-ix86/Rcpp-00check.html
Tres etrange, as Romain develops on OS X himself. I will have to pass on this one for lack of access to such shiny hardware. He may fix it, or he may not. I vaguely recall us discussing that with you and Romain's inability to reproduce it. As such, chances of improvement may be slim. Tant pis. | And OS X is not the only place as you'll see when you look at | http://cran.r-project.org/web/checks/check_results_Rcpp.html I do look there regularly but I cannot fix Slowlaris and the funky SunOS compiler messages until we get the rumoured 'bin-builder'. Hints for shutting up R-devel on the 'size' NOTE concerning the arbitrary 1mb cutoff (hey, "640kb should be enough for everyone" so why not use that?) would be welcome too. Dirk -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
