On 31 August 2011 at 12:43, Zhongyi Yuan wrote: | | | On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 11:20 AM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: | | | It is just for convenience -- this allows you to write shorter programs for | inline, but it does not prevent you from being explicit and using the | Rcpp:: | prefix. I tend to most of the time too because I prefer that style. | | | Thank you, Dirk. | Can I ask for specific reasons why people prefer explicit? Any potential | danger for not being explicit?
To me: Easier to read, and hence easier to maintain, maybe less buggy. But it is a style question, and people endlessly debate those. Dirk -- Two new Rcpp master classes for R and C++ integration scheduled for New York (Sep 24) and San Francisco (Oct 8), more details are at http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com/blog/2011/08/04#rcpp_classes_2011-09_and_2011-10 http://www.revolutionanalytics.com/products/training/public/rcpp-master-class.php _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
