On 7 September 2012 at 10:51, Rodney Sparapani wrote:
| There must be something that I am totally missing with respect to
| pnorm/qnorm. Is there a more clever way to write
| Rcpp::stats::qnorm_0(x, 1, 0) or Rcpp::stats::pnorm_0(x, 1, 0)?
| Have I over-looked some docs for these? I've been using Rcpp heavily
| for the last month and really enjoying it!
As a general, looking at the unit test files can be helpful. Here is one for
qnorm:
"runit_qnorm_prob" = list(
signature( x = "numeric" ),
'
NumericVector xx(x) ;
return List::create(_["lower"] = qnorm( xx, 0.0, 1.0 ),
_["upper"] = qnorm( xx, 0.0, 1.0, false));
')
Ie you can just call 'pnorm', 'qnorm', ...
Dirk
--
Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
