On 12 September 2012 at 08:38, Rodney Sparapani wrote: | On 09/07/2012 12:19 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > |> As a general, looking at the unit test files can be helpful. Here is one for qnorm: | > |> | > |> "runit_qnorm_prob" = list( | > |> signature( x = "numeric" ), | > |> ' | > |> NumericVector xx(x) ; | > |> return List::create(_["lower"] = qnorm( xx, 0.0, 1.0 ), | > |> _["upper"] = qnorm( xx, 0.0, 1.0, false)); | > |> ') | | The unit tests are indeed very helpful. However, I have been trying to | figure out how the unit tests were developed. As far as I can see, | there is nothing in Rcpp nor Rmath.h that actually specifies the | prototypes like the example above (and I did look, hence my initial
If that were true, the code would compile. The code compiles so ... And: edd@max:~$ grep -r qnorm /usr/local/lib/R/site-library/Rcpp/include/ | wc -l 10 edd@max:~$ | confusion about the syntax of qnorm). Were these written simply by | looking at the R help itself like ?qnorm or were they automated in | some way? Thanks There is no magic pixie dust. Some headers are script-generated, even those scripts are in SVN. Some of the p/q/d/r-sugar functions are from macro expansions as you will see. Dirk -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
