On 19 February 2013 at 23:46, Ken Williams wrote:
| > From: Dirk Eddelbuettel [mailto:e...@debian.org]
| > You are relying on an implicit conversion here to make df(.,.) a double. The
| > compiler tells you that it is trying sugar operators.  Sugar is good to 
have in
| > Rcpp, but occassionally there is a cost. This may be one of those times.
| >
| > Try
| >
| >       double a = df(j,i);
| >       double b = df(j,last_i);
| >         if (fabs(a - b) > thresh) {
| >
| > and see if that works.
| 
| Unfortunately no, I get a similar error when I try that:
| 
| window.cpp:68:24: error: conversion from 'Rcpp::Vector<19>::Proxy {aka 
Rcpp::internal::generic_proxy<19>}' to 'double' is ambiguous
| window.cpp:68:24: note: candidates are:
| C:/mybin/R/R-2.15.2/library/Rcpp/include/Rcpp/vector/string_proxy.h:273:4: 
note: Rcpp::internal::generic_proxy<RTYPE>::operator int() const [with int 
RTYPE = 19]
| C:/mybin/R/R-2.15.2/library/Rcpp/include/Rcpp/vector/string_proxy.h:272:4: 
note: Rcpp::internal::generic_proxy<RTYPE>::operator bool() const [with int 
RTYPE = 19]
| C:/mybin/R/R-2.15.2/library/Rcpp/include/Rcpp/vector/string_proxy.h:267:26: 
note: Rcpp::internal::generic_proxy<RTYPE>::operator U() const [with U = 
double, int RTYPE = 19]

Maybe try std::fabs() instead of fabs() ?

That is one of the reasons I do not like a global 'using namespace Rcpp' in
my code.  Explicit namespaces are, well, explicit.

Dirk
| 
| 
| >
| > Not every conceivable operation is implemented in Rcpp,
| 
| Of course. =)
| 
| > but we are always
| > open to patches to make it more complete.
| 
| If I can get myself up to speed with my understanding, I'll be happy to 
contribute what I can.
| 
|  -Ken
| 
| ________________________________
| 
| CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail message is for the sole use of the 
intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. 
Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution of any kind is 
strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the 
sender via reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank 
you.

-- 
Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com  
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel

Reply via email to