> Maybe you could follow the example of Rcpp.package.skeleton() and just drop > an empty yet amply commented file there? By "being there" users have a > better chance of stumbling over it :) >
Since this would involve creating a new directory (inst/include) perhaps I could instead emit comments at the top of RcppExports.cpp explaining the mechanism?
_______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
