On 19 October 2013 at 15:40, JJ Allaire wrote: | | Maybe you could follow the example of Rcpp.package.skeleton() and just drop | an empty yet amply commented file there? By "being there" users have a | better chance of stumbling over it :) | | | Since this would involve creating a new directory (inst/include) perhaps I | could instead emit comments at the top of RcppExports.cpp explaining the | mechanism?
True, but maybe I'd still go for it. inst/include/ is after all the place via which a any package foo can provide its headers to another package bar which simply adds 'LinkingTo: foo'. Currently, the 'cost' of attributes is one extra RcppExports.R, one RcppExports.cpp and we'd add a new (small, few lines with comments) header file in a new directory. Seems fair to me -- but entirely your call. Restraint in not cluttering user systems is also a good thing. We'd be back to the need for more/better documentation though. Dirk -- Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
