Dirk, no problem, in any case I can always get the new RcppArmadillo from Github and use that to build my package on Windows.
I am quite sure yesterday my package was working on win-builder and I might have read 0.4.300.8.0 somewhere. Then today it wasn't working any more so I got confused. Thanks for the clarification. Matteo On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > > Matteo, > > On 3 June 2014 at 17:24, Matteo Fasiolo wrote: > | could it be that yesterday the official RccpArmadillo version on CRAN > | was 0.4.300.7.0 (the one with the new armadillo macro), > | while today it's 0.4.300.0? Or did I dream about it? :) > > :-/ > > You were dreaming. Or maybe you saw it in the incoming/ directory. > > I did pretty extensive tests on 0.4.300.7.0 (which passes R CMD check for > 64 > out of 67 CRAN packages using RcppArmadillo; a few details in the rcpp-logs > repo on GitHub) and submitted it. CRAN bemoaned a bashism in the small > little configure script, as well as something to setup temporary files for > unit tests (which has not changed in ages), so I fixed both of these issues > and resubmitted. And keep waiting. > > In the meantime Conrad rolled up 4.300.8 so I created 0.4.300.8.0 and > submitted that. And keep waiting. > > One day... In the meantime, you get the sources from GitHub but for > windows > builds at CRAN, and the win-builder service, we have to wait. FWIW I have > also been waiting for three weeks now to have an additional static library > (hiredis, used by RcppRedis) installed on win-builder. > > Sometimes, our hands are tied and there is nuttin' we can do. Sorry. > > Dirk > > -- > Dirk Eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com >
_______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
