Hi Matteo, On 11 June 2014 at 23:29, Matteo Fasiolo wrote: | after realizing that the only C++11 feature I was using was <random> I decided | to switch | to boost::normal_distribution. In particular I now link to BH, but I don't use | the boost::normal_distribution | from there, but the one in this commit: | | http://lists.boost.org/boost-commit/2012/10/43158.php | | which is much faster than the current version. Hopefully the package will now | work on all platforms!
Nice, and it should thanks to BH and its headers. OS X won't have OpenMP support (yet, apparently some future version will). But Linux and Windows should be fine. Dirk | Thanks, | | Matteo | | | On Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 8:02 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: | | | On 9 June 2014 at 17:45, Matteo Fasiolo wrote: | | Hi Dirk | | | | | | | | Saw that -- mvnfast looks quite interesting with OpenMP-based RNG! | | | | | | | | | Yes, using a single header parallel RNG, which is compatible with C++11 | random | | distributions made | | all the work much easier! The C++11 part is creating lots of problems, | though. | | I owe you a follow-up (maybe later today) about how/where it built for me | with clang. This seems to have to do with the 'C++' library one uses with | clang/llvm; it seems on Debian it comes from g++-4.8 which works. | | Dirk | | | Yes. For the two (smaller) packages (RcppCNPy, and RcppBDT) where I | use | | C++11 features I have | | | | Depends: R (>= 3.1.0) | | | | and you should too as C++11 does need R 3.1.0 or later. | | | | | | | | | | Thanks, Prof. Ripley pointed at the same solution. | | | | Matteo | | -- | http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | | -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
