On 30 April 2015 at 06:12, JJ Allaire wrote: | On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Sean O'Riordain <seori...@tcd.ie> wrote: | > I am curious about the phrase "distribute internally" - surely under GPL, | > that is still distribution and all modifications should thus be made public? | > The GPL does not distinguish between "internal" distribution and any other | > kind. | > | | Indeed it does: | https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic
Nice discussion all around, and I like how the GPL-2 emerged as a consensus. It's been my default license for 20-some years too. But I think are not adding anyting new at this point (beyond maybe being new to Soren and Carlo). There are _many_ places on the internet more focussed on this topic. Maybe the discussion could move there? Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
