Good idea, Dirk, thanks for all notes and help. Sören
> On 30.04.2015, at 13:15, Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On 30 April 2015 at 06:12, JJ Allaire wrote: > | On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 6:09 AM, Sean O'Riordain <seori...@tcd.ie> wrote: > | > I am curious about the phrase "distribute internally" - surely under GPL, > | > that is still distribution and all modifications should thus be made > public? > | > The GPL does not distinguish between "internal" distribution and any other > | > kind. > | > > | > | Indeed it does: > | > https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0-faq.html#GPLRequireSourcePostedPublic > > Nice discussion all around, and I like how the GPL-2 emerged as a > consensus. It's been my default license for 20-some years too. > > But I think are not adding anyting new at this point (beyond maybe being new > to Soren and Carlo). There are _many_ places on the internet more focussed > on this topic. Maybe the discussion could move there? > > Dirk > > -- > http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org > _______________________________________________ > Rcpp-devel mailing list > Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org > https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
