Hi Dirk! Well, I have been using R - for applied statistics - much more than Qt!
Anyway, thank you for your hints and advices. I agree with you that Qt is well documented (though not! everything; that's why there exist severl! qt-forums where also sometimes experts are searching for answers, not only newbies :-)). Once everthing runs, I will let you know (here and how). :-) Bye, Klemens Am 16.05.2015 18:55 schrieb "Dirk Eddelbuettel" <e...@debian.org>: > > On 16 May 2015 at 18:45, Klemens Weigl wrote: > | An easy tutorial to learn and test it step-by-step would be nice! > Otherwise, no > > I think you may still misunderstand how Qt and R works, or maybe I have > trouble understanding your emails. > > Start by becoming familiar with Qt itself. It is 20+ years old, *very* > mature > and polished and *extremely* well documented. There are (truly) thousands > of > tutorials. Pick any one, and learn how Qt goes from a file *.pro to a > Makefile via 'qmake'. Modify those files, learn how to add a library (say > libgsl and its headers, or if you want the Rmath library). Do not yet > touch > Rcpp or RInside. > > Once you understand all that, brew a fresh cup of coffee or tea and look > again at the RInside example for Qt. It. Just. Works. > > And by combining what you learned about Qt with what you know about R -- > and > a working, tested and documented example such as the one we provide for > RInside -- you should be able to program with Qt and R. > > Dirk > > -- > http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org >
_______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
