Can you give more information on why we need this or what problem people
are facing now?
Best,
KK
On Thu, Jul 27, 2017 at 9:37 AM, Serguei Sokol <serguei.so...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I can hear from here "Oh no, not again this question!" ;)
> But this time it is not a question it is a feature suggestion.
> What if we replace in RcppArmadilloWrap.h:64:
> template <typename T> SEXP wrap( const arma::Col<T>& data ){
> return RcppArmadillo::arma_wrap( data, Dimension( data.n_elem, 1)
> ) ;
> }
> by something like:
> template <typename T> SEXP wrap( const arma::Col<T>& data ){
> #ifdef RETURN_COLVEC_AS_VECTOR
> return RcppArmadillo::arma_wrap( data ) ;
> #else
> return RcppArmadillo::arma_wrap( data, Dimension( data.n_elem, 1)
> ) ;
> #endif
> }
>
> In this way, a legacy code relying on one column matrix is not impacted,
> while other users can define a macro RETURN_COLVEC_AS_VECTOR
> before "#include <Rcpp>" and enjoy a more intuitive behavior.
>
> Was it already proposed and rejected?
>
> Best,
> Serguei.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rcpp-devel mailing list
> Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
> https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
>
--
Qiang Kou
q...@umail.iu.edu
School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
