Dirk Eddelbuettel has written at  Fri, 28 Jul 2017 17:28:11 -0500
On 28 July 2017 at 14:59, Serguei Sokol wrote:
| Le 28/07/2017 à 13:45, Dirk Eddelbuettel a écrit :
| > Don't think so, but I have thought about it too, and I was planning to bring
| > this up.  I also find the 'always forced to be dimension one matrix' to be a
| > (very early) design decision I would not make again.  And I have been
| > thinking along similar lines---we need an option to restore it / keep it as
| > the defaults, and a newer alternative to let this collapse to a dimless
| > vector.  What you rprose could work (maybe by prefixing RCPP_ARMADILLO_ to
| > the #define though).
| Cool. Then to be complete, we can think about a full set of options, smth. 
like:
| RCPP_ARMADILLO_RETURN_COLVEC_AS_VECTOR
| RCPP_ARMADILLO_RETURN_ROWVEC_AS_VECTOR
| RCPP_ARMADILLO_RETURN_ANYVEC_AS_VECTOR

Thumbs up!

Do you want to sketch a pull request, or shall we take this offline?
A pull request #151 is awaiting your exam.

Serguei.
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel

Reply via email to