2017-07-29 16:15 GMT+02:00 Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org>: > > On 29 July 2017 at 15:48, Iñaki Úcar wrote: > | Yes, I am, and I think that my use case is slightly different. My > | understanding is, correct me if I'm wrong, that RcppDE implements some > | C++ functions and the user is able to choose which one the backend > | should use via its name. In my case, the user is the one that would > | implement a C++ function for which the backend is unaware: it doesn't > | know the name and it's located in another dynamic library. > > Exactly the same here. You misunderstood the example and failed to grasp the > generality. > > All you do is specify a signature -- i.e. accepting two NumericVector and > returning a third. Then the external pointer takes care of everything. You > as the API provider known nothing about the supplied functions. > > Ditto in RcppDE. Optmises any function.
Ok, then I have to check RcppDE more in detail. Thanks for your help! Iñaki _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
