2017-07-31 1:29 GMT+02:00 Dirk Eddelbuettel <e...@debian.org>: > > This might be most suitable for an add-on package, at least until all bugs > are ironed out. The use case and scope is more limited than for > cppFunction().
Agree. In fact, I can prepend the getter's declaration and append the definition, so that I can rely entirely on cppFunction without duplicating any code. Ok then, I'll sketch out a new package. May I use the name "RcppXPtr"? Iñaki _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
