On 19 March 2018 at 08:24, Iñaki Úcar wrote:
| Hi -- I hope my last email didn't hit the spam folder. :-)
It didn't but it is a little hard to say anything here. Sometimes the
compiler needs help with disambiguation as you said.
Dirk
| Iñaki
|
| 2018-03-14 18:51 GMT+01:00 Iñaki Úcar <i.uca...@gmail.com>:
| > Hi all,
| >
| > I'm not sure whether this is a bug or not, so I think this is the
| > right place to start with. Consider the following code:
| >
| > Rcpp::sourceCpp(code='
| > #include <Rcpp.h>
| > using namespace Rcpp;
| >
| > // [[Rcpp::export]]
| > void print_fun(Function x) {
| > Rcout << x << std::endl;
| > }
| >
| > // [[Rcpp::export]]
| > void print_env(Environment x) {
| > Rcout << x << std::endl;
| > }
| > ')
| >
| > print_fun(function() {})
| > print_env(environment())
| >
| > It compiles and the output from the functions are two addresses. So
| > far, so good. However, if we try the same for a data frame, the
| > compilation fails, so we need to define the operator<< as follows:
| >
| > Rcpp::sourceCpp(code='
| > #include <Rcpp.h>
| > using namespace Rcpp;
| >
| > inline std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& out, const DataFrame& df) {
| > out << "data.frame";
| > return out;
| > }
| >
| > // [[Rcpp::export]]
| > void print_df(DataFrame x) {
| > Rcout << x << std::endl;
| > }
| > ')
| >
| > print_df(data.frame(x=1))
| >
| > Now, it compiles and produces the output we defined. Once more, so
| > far, so good. Now the problem comes when we try to merge the two
| > examples above, that is:
| >
| > Rcpp::sourceCpp(code='
| > #include <Rcpp.h>
| > using namespace Rcpp;
| >
| > inline std::ostream& operator<<(std::ostream& out, const DataFrame& df) {
| > out << "data.frame";
| > return out;
| > }
| >
| > // [[Rcpp::export]]
| > void print_df(DataFrame x) {
| > Rcout << x << std::endl;
| > }
| >
| > // [[Rcpp::export]]
| > void print_fun(Function x) {
| > Rcout << x << std::endl;
| > }
| >
| > // [[Rcpp::export]]
| > void print_env(Environment x) {
| > Rcout << x << std::endl;
| > }
| > ')
| >
| > The compilation fails again due to an ambiguous overload for Function
| > and Environment types, so that we need to define the operator<< for
| > these classes too in order to disambiguate and fix this. I suppose it
| > may happen for other classes too. Is this... expected? Desirable? At
| > the very least, it is confusing from my point of view.
| >
| > Regards,
| > Iñaki
| _______________________________________________
| Rcpp-devel mailing list
| Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
| https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
_______________________________________________
Rcpp-devel mailing list
Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org
https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
