On 20 March 2018 at 11:42, Iñaki Úcar wrote: | I may have my own reasons for that, but that's not the point here. The | point is that I expected a homogeneous behaviour across Rcpp classes | when any object is passed to operator<< (i.e., print *something*). | | By grepping the source, I discovered that Matrix and Vector have an | implementation of operator<<, but not the other classes. | | Of course, this is a minor issue, because anyone is able to define | this operator if needed. I simply wanted to note it here, just in case | Dirk considered that all classes should have a well-defined one.
Yes, there are always some missing elements and holes. Contributions welcome. The operator<<() addition for matrices and vectors came as those types are most often used. "General purpose" operators are a lot work, particularly for data.frame, see eg all the work dplyr, tibble, pillar, ... are going through. We do have a print() method though that dispatches to R's print function. Dirk -- http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org _______________________________________________ Rcpp-devel mailing list Rcpp-devel@lists.r-forge.r-project.org https://lists.r-forge.r-project.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rcpp-devel
