After great effort , determination and expenditure the Funky Tank
Foundry has developed a remarkable range finding system for not only
Neil’s leopard but any tank out there .
Here is the results:-
A shot is fired in the direction of the enemy and if it falls short of
the target the suggestion is to raise the barrel a bit , Ok you might
think that’s very simple , now comes the clever part, if  the next
shot fly’s `over ` the intended target then the  recommendation is to
lower the barrel again, but importantly not as low as it was
initially. If by this stage the target has still eluded a beating then
at this critical stage the advice is to move a bit closer to the
target and quickly return to the original plan.
Many lives were risked leaking out the results of this research , as
the FTF Managing Director is a bit of a nasty piece of work . use this
information wisely if anyone has read this far.
Over !

Mr A Non



On May 15, 8:22 pm, Michael Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was thinking about a range finding artillery solution. Set up the
> artillery piece at and create either a Forward Observers post that could be
> disabled or mount it on a location aware recon vehicle.
>
> From there I was a bit lost. Either have the artillery be the second leg of
> a triangle. Or have the recon vehicle say "I'm here, the target is 15 feet
> to my west."
>
> Michael "I'm building a tank. Honest"
>
> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Jason R Schafer 
> <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>
>
> > cool!  I'd like to see it sometime.
>
> > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Derek Engelhaupt <[email protected]>wrote:
>
> >> Whoohoo...another Minnesotan.  I'm way up north, but have an *almost*
> >> fully functional tank ready to paint someone....
>
> >> Derek
> >> T065 - Lutsen, MN
>
> >> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Frank Pittelli <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> >>> Jason R Schafer wrote:
> >>> > Any current or ex R/C warship combat guys in the hobby?
>
> >>> The tank hobby was founded by two ex-IRCWCC national champions with over
> >>> 20 years of combined warship battling experience.
>
> >>> > Is anybody trying any sort of barrel stabilization systems?
> >>> > Would this be legal?
>
> >>> Perfectly legal.  There are very few restrictions on tank sub-system
> >>> technology.  If it's not covered in the rules, you can use whatever you
> >>> think will give you an advantage.  Moreover, if you are the first to use
> >>>  a technology on the battlefield, you'll probably have your name
> >>> attached to the solution for all the world to see.
>
> >>> > What about range finding etc?
>
> >>> Go for it.
>
> >>> > It seems your rules are very open to technological advancements ...
> >>> > how fun!
>
> >>> Yes. See (1) and (2) above.
>
> >>>        Frank P.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group.
To post a message, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to