Ohhh.... That reminds me. I was at Lowes the other day and in the tool
section they had portable CO2 bottles for air powered tools and there is
supposed to be a bottle exchange program.

On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 12:38 PM, jvragu47 <[email protected]> wrote:

>
> From the Director of Cost Management
> M.A.G. Industries
>
> Based on the following figures, firing 500 rounds per 1 hour of
> battle, using one 12oz Co2 bottle,
> it costs approximately 2 cents US ,per round fired. Your price may
> vary, cost based on purchase of 2000 rounds @$60 and 2 Co2 fills at
> $2.50 each. Maintaining serious amounts of fire to harass the enemy,
> PRICELESS.
>
> Mr. C. Non
>
>
> On May 16, 11:14 am, [email protected] wrote:
> > After great effort , determination and expenditure the Funky Tank
> > Foundry has developed a remarkable range finding system for not only
> > Neil’s leopard but any tank out there .
> > Here is the results:-
> > A shot is fired in the direction of the enemy and if it falls short of
> > the target the suggestion is to raise the barrel a bit , Ok you might
> > think that’s very simple , now comes the clever part, if  the next
> > shot fly’s `over ` the intended target then the  recommendation is to
> > lower the barrel again, but importantly not as low as it was
> > initially. If by this stage the target has still eluded a beating then
> > at this critical stage the advice is to move a bit closer to the
> > target and quickly return to the original plan.
> > Many lives were risked leaking out the results of this research , as
> > the FTF Managing Director is a bit of a nasty piece of work . use this
> > information wisely if anyone has read this far.
> > Over !
> >
> > Mr A Non
> >
> > On May 15, 8:22 pm, Michael Clark <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > I was thinking about a range finding artillery solution. Set up the
> > > artillery piece at and create either a Forward Observers post that
> could be
> > > disabled or mount it on a location aware recon vehicle.
> >
> > > From there I was a bit lost. Either have the artillery be the second
> leg of
> > > a triangle. Or have the recon vehicle say "I'm here, the target is 15
> feet
> > > to my west."
> >
> > > Michael "I'm building a tank. Honest"
> >
> > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Jason R Schafer <
> [email protected]>wrote:
> >
> > > > cool!  I'd like to see it sometime.
> >
> > > > On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Derek Engelhaupt <[email protected]
> >wrote:
> >
> > > >> Whoohoo...another Minnesotan.  I'm way up north, but have an
> *almost*
> > > >> fully functional tank ready to paint someone....
> >
> > > >> Derek
> > > >> T065 - Lutsen, MN
> >
> > > >> On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 10:09 AM, Frank Pittelli <
> > > >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > >>> Jason R Schafer wrote:
> > > >>> > Any current or ex R/C warship combat guys in the hobby?
> >
> > > >>> The tank hobby was founded by two ex-IRCWCC national champions with
> over
> > > >>> 20 years of combined warship battling experience.
> >
> > > >>> > Is anybody trying any sort of barrel stabilization systems?
> > > >>> > Would this be legal?
> >
> > > >>> Perfectly legal.  There are very few restrictions on tank
> sub-system
> > > >>> technology.  If it's not covered in the rules, you can use whatever
> you
> > > >>> think will give you an advantage.  Moreover, if you are the first
> to use
> > > >>>  a technology on the battlefield, you'll probably have your name
> > > >>> attached to the solution for all the world to see.
> >
> > > >>> > What about range finding etc?
> >
> > > >>> Go for it.
> >
> > > >>> > It seems your rules are very open to technological advancements
> ...
> > > >>> > how fun!
> >
> > > >>> Yes. See (1) and (2) above.
> >
> > > >>>        Frank P.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > - Show quoted text -
> >
> >
> >
>

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group.
To post a message, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]
Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to