As I've mentioned before....I'm going to get my M113 to swim, but that's a project that won't be tackled for quite some time.
Derek SV016 T065 KV-2 on hold On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Clark Ward Jr <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with sneaking in bouyancy where ever we can. I was going to > do a dissertation on metacentric height, ad nauseum, but then it > occurred to me that if a 1/6 scale tank suffers a casualty that allows > water in, it's going down regardless of design features lol. Not > enough reserve bouyancy by half, even with super-lightweight > batteries. Still would love to see a PT-76 running around and > swimmable. Or an LAV. > > -- > Clark in Georgia > > -- > You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. > To post a message, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] > Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat > -- You are currently subscribed to the "R/C Tank Combat" group. To post a message, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected] Visit the group at http://groups.google.com/group/rctankcombat
